Steams of Revenue: How Songwriters Make Money.

22 08 2010

Hello? I'm looking for the writer of Toxic. I think I owe him money.

Music is everywhere.  You turn on your tv, see a youtube video or turn on the radio and  hear a famous artist performing a song.  But who makes money when the public hears or sees a performance? 

It is a common misperception to think that the artist you see or hear is making all of the money from that song.  In the pop world, especially, this is not true.  Don’t get me wrong, the famous artist probably has more money than you or I could ever dream of.  However, the main revenue streams come from songwriting.  Oftentimes, pop stars do not write their own songs.  Songwriting for bands or artists can bring in huge amounts of money.  The main areas of revenue from songwriting come from mechanical royalties, performance royalties and synchronization licenses. 

Suppose you write a song and a major artist (for this post let’s use Justin Timberlake) decides he wants to record your song and put in on his next album.  If your song has never been released to the public his label will have to pay you a First Use Mechanical License.  This gives Mr. Timberlake the right to be the first person to reproduce and distribute your song.  The rate for a First Use is negotiable and varies widely.  You have to weigh the exposure of being on Justin Timberlake’s next album vs. your leverage in getting paid.  But, keep in mind; this will not be your only source of revenue.  Let’s say you and Timberlake’s label settle on $15,000 for the First Use right (this could be and probably is higher or lower). 

So, you now have $15,000 in your pocket but cannot be the first one to record and release your own song.  That tradeoff is up to you.  Let’s assume you think it is worth it.  What other sources of revenue streams can you now expect from this song? 

First off, for every copy of the song reproduced you should receive 9.1 cents.  Usually, this is only paid on each copy sold (digital or physical).  So, for every album sold you should received 9.1 cents.  If your song happens to be the single or a hit, chances are your song will sell digitally as a single more than the entire album.  So, for every 99 cent download you should receive 9.1 cents.  If the single or single and album combined sell 1,000,000 you should receive $91,000.  Not bad.  Not bad at all.  Keep in mind that label contracts and tricky accounting can lower these numbers.  However, the 9.1 cent rate is set by the government.

Another lucrative source of revenue is from synchronization licenses.   Every time a song is placed with a visual (think on a tv show, in a video game or in a movie) the writer and publisher must grant a synchronization license.  This is a negotiated rate.  A hit movie can pay in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for a theme song or a song that plays in the climax of a movie.  A television show will pay less but this difference can be made up in performance royalties.

Did someone say performance royalties?  Yes.  In addition to getting paid to have your song in a movie or television show you will also receive money each time the tv show airs, the movie is shown outside the U.S. or shown on tv.  Lastly, if your song is a single and receives radio airplay or is played on the internet you will receive performance royalties.  All of these performance royalties are collected and distributed by performance rights organizations.  In the U.S. we have three;  ASCAP, BMI and SESAC. 

As you can see being a songwriter can be a very lucrative business.   You will have access to multiple revenue streams.  Think of the writers of the song “Toxic” by Britney Spears.  She did not write that song.  However, every time it aired on MTV or radio the writers received performance royalties; every time her album sold or someone bought “Toxic” the writers received a mechanical royalty.  If anyone wanted to use the song in a video game, movie or tv show , the writers would get paid multiple times.  Also, if any cover versions are done the writers would receive mechanical royalties.  I really wish I wrote that song.

Protecting yourself as a songwriter is not an easy proposition.  Seek counsel if anyone wants to buy your song or if you are going start publishing your own material.

SHAMELESS SELF PROMOTION OF THE WEEK:

Come check out L4M and a ton of other experts on music and advertising at the Billboard Music and Advertising Fall seminar on September 15-16, 2010 at the Westin on Michigan Avenue right here in Chicago.  We are on a panel and will be floating around all weekend.  Follow up the seminar on the 16th with a L4M sponsored show at Bottom Lounge featuring Blah Blah Blah.   More info coming soon.

www.MusicAndAdvertisingFall.com





Lollapalooza and Lost Amongst the Giants

6 08 2010

How do you book Lolla's main stage?

 

As Chicagoans, we are spoiled with great music and great music festivals.  Whether it is a local street fest with unknown but talented local bands, one of the many venues (Metro, Bottom Lounge, Park West…), Pitchfork Festival or the grandaddy of all commercial festivals, Lollapalooza, the Second City has to rank as one of the best music cities in the world.  As a music fan the choices are too numerous to count.  Often we are left with a sense of regret if we choose to check out Schubas while there is a great show going on at Double Door or we pick the wrong stage at Grant Park and find out that MGMT actually tried during their live set this year.  

As fans, these dilemmas are pretty minor.  As a band, getting noticed or better yet, getting booked can be overwhelming, frustrating and just flat out depressing.  There is a wicked catch 22 situation between labels and bands these days and booking gigs is just one part of it.  Labels and investors look for many things when determining whether to sign a band.  The label will look at the number of units sold (digital/physical), the number of fans (facebook/myspace), the amount of press garnered, and the number of shows booked (taking into account the quality of those shows).  

So a band is then faced with proving itself by doing a lot of work itself.  The band and management (if management is in place) must grind it out to show that it can sell or give away a sufficient number of albums, generate its own press and social media statistics and book its own shows.  Booking agents are out there but agents will only take a band onto its roster if the band has already proven itself by booking a ton of shows on its own.  The band is left with the nauseating decision of whether it is better to not play at all or to play their uncle’s picnic just so it can “book” a show.  All of this has to be done while also factoring in that touring and playing live shows may be the only source of income for a band.  (You sure you want to be a musician?) 

The best advice that we can give to a band who is in this type of crappy situation is to forget labels and booking agents.  Just pretend they don’t exist.  Once that impossible task is completed, the band can focus on a plan of attack.  Let’s assume that the band is talented, has a local following and can book a few decent size venues on a regular basis within its home town.  No band is going to make a comfortable living doing this, but being able to take up a residency at a solid venue in a metropolitan area is a really good first step.  The band then has to find other bands from the same city and from surrounding cities and states and get them to play at their venue with the hope of reciprocity.  Assuming that goes well and the bands from other cities like your band, you now have an invitation to play in a new city or state.  As momentum grows, small local tours can be arranged all without the almighty aid of a booking agent or a label.  The band has to team up within its own community.  Take solace in the fact that there are a million other bands in the same situation as yours.  When you team up you are that much stronger.  

Now that you have a plan of attack (which may take several months or more to put together), you can attract more fans, sell more merchandise and book more gigs.  Wait a second; isn’t that what labels and booking agents are looking for?  Ah-ha.  Obviously, this takes a lot of hard work, committment and organization.  If those attributes are not your strong suit, you better quit the business or get a team together who can help.  As we consistently tell our clients, being in a band is a lot of hard work.  We turn down clients who are looking for a quick fix or for someone else to get them to where they think they want to be.  If you are not committed to making music a full time job, it most likely will not happen for you. 

Hopefully this was more motivational than depressing.  Either way, we are off to Lolla to make some bad decisions about who to check out and marvel at hipsters in skinny jeans. 

SHAMELESS SELF PROMOTION (SORT OF) OF THE WEEK: 

THE BOTTOM LOUNGE – CHICAGO 

 

L4m is psyched to partner with one of Chicago’s best live music venues, The Bottom Lounge.   The place is large yet intimate, the beer list is large and amazing and the staff is not large but also awesome.  We plan on working with them to showcase both our clients and other bands who will eventually be our clients (or not).  If you haven’t gone to a show there yet, shame on you.  If you have, then you are super smart.  Stay tuned for updates on our collaboration.





Where in the world is Section 181? (It’s Gone)

23 07 2010

Even Carmen is looking for Section 181 extensions.

7/23 UPDATE: The official text of the enrolled version of HR 4213 is now available here:  http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:h4213enr.txt.pdf

Unfortunately, Section 181 is NOT included.  So until further notice, the incentive that meant so much to so many film makers is gone.   We are still hopeful that a Congressperson will re-introudce the legislation and will continue to monitor the situation, but for now, the outlook its less than great. 

7/22 UPDATE: HR 4213 passed Congress and was signed by President Obama today.  However, the text of the law has not been published and it is unclear if the extension of Section 181 was included.  If Senator Reid’s amendment replaced HR 4213 in its entirety, Section has not been extended.  As always, stay tuned.

 

7/21 UPDATE:  Yesterday, July 20, 2010, the Senate had a Cloture Vote on whether or not to move forward on HR 4213, the Unemployment Bill which includes an extension of 181.  The Senate needed a 60-40 vote to move forward and, thankfully, it got it!  So, hopefully by the middle of next week (possibly Tuesday), there will be a final vote on HR 4213.  Closure is one excruciating step closer. 

As most of my film related readers know, I have been doing my best to stay on top of the renewal/extension process of Section 181 (just search my past posts).  Unfortunately, over the past several weeks, there is nothing real or solid to report other than the fact that the federal tax incentive for films produced in the United States seems to be lost in legislative oblivion.  When HR 4213 passed both the House and the Senate, I thought we were home free.  Yet, due to the fact that the incentive was grouped with unemployment benefits (a rather hot topic in politics these days) and other high profile tax credits, Congress debated, modified, an altered HR 4213 so much that it had to go back to committee.  Now, more than six months after it officially expired, Section 181 is still stuck in limbo. 

Senators who promised a quick resolution and renewal of 181 have all but shut up at this point (see this post for the empty promise from Reid and Baucus).  According to the office of the biggest supporters of Section 181 and a Representative who actually introduced legislation to extend 181, Representative Diane Watson, the extension is not any closer to being approved.  Officially, the bill, which has passed both the House and the Senate, is back in committee to “work out the differences between the versions of the bill which passed both  houses” (according to www.govtrack.us).  The question is, when will a government who is struggling to agree to anything finally agree to deal with additional tax incentives or credits?

So what are film makers to do?  The film makers we at L4M represent are keeping their books as if Section 181 will eventually be renewed.  Yet, to the potential investors, we cannot advise and do not include promises of federal incentives.  We continue to work with State offices to capitalize on the best State tax credits while continuing to keep an eye (a sleepy, tired eye) on 181.





Help Matthew Leone by Seeing the Pumpkins at Metro!

21 07 2010

Amazing news for music fans!  The Smashing Pumpkins and Kill Hannah will be playing a benefit concert for Matthew Leone of Madina Lake on July 27, 2010.  Tickets will be raffled off for a $10 donation.  VIP and sound check tickets will also be available for purchase.  The raffle and sale start on NOON, JULY 21, 2010.   Go to http://metrochicago.com for all the details.  

Kudos to Ajay Gosain for all his hard work putting this together.  Ajay rules!





Songwriters Take Note and How to Help Matthew Leone

20 07 2010

Songwriters and producers need to take note.  Our friends at Songwriteruniverse.com certainly did.  Follow this link to an article penned by L4M (Ajay and Josh).  The world of copyright and recapturing your own copyrights is massively confusing.  Stay tuned to L4M and our friends for more guidance. 

L4M have a close and personal relationship with the band Madina Lake.  Recently, Matthew Leone was a victim of senseless violence.  Just moments before Matthew was beaten up, he successfully stopped the criminal from beating his spouse.  His story is all over the news and tons of fans, colleagues, friends and other good samaritans out there have come to his aid.  Click here for an NME story about the incident. 

As part of the effort to help Matthew get back on his feet please follow the link below

http://www.pledgemusic.com/projects/madinalake

or go to:

www.madinalake.com





THE L4M MODEL GETS SOME LOVE: Band plus budget (The Deal Magazine)

2 07 2010

 

Band plus budget (The Deal Magazine). CLICK LINK FOR STORY

It is good to know that certain labels and certain industry experts understand the new model for musicians.  “The 360 deal” does not have to have a negative connotation.  Finding the right partners and the right team for your project has been our focus from the jump. 

Special thanks to Townie Records , Hey Champ and the author of the article Matt Miller from The Deal.com.





Does Forever Really Mean Forever? Recapture Your Copyrights.

13 06 2010

The Library of Congress is going to be a busy place thanks to recapture rights.

This post was written by Ajay Gosain, the newest member of L4M

Suppose you are a publisher or a record label and I am a 25 year old writer or artist.  You are impressed with my music and we begin talking.  After a couple of weeks of proper courting we decide to consummate the relationship.  You present me with a contract.  The language states you give me money as an advance; in exchange, I give you my music and the copyrights linked to the music for the life of the copyrights.  This seems like an awfully long time, no? After all, life of copyright is 70 years after my inevitable death.  You, as publisher or label, want me to assign my copyright to you, basically, forever.  So, assume I sign the contract in ink (or blood or something).  Is that it?  Will my work remain with your company for the next 100 years or so?  No.  Not necessarily. 

Despite what many think and despite the language of the contract, you may be able to get your copyrights back. There are strict time lines and certain formalities that must be followed; which, if done timely and correctly, will result in you getting your copyrights back.  These guidelines are set forth in a little discussed portion of the 1976 Copyright Act (Section 203 to be precise). Note: This does not apply for works made for hire which we will discuss in a future post. 

 Section 203 provides a chance for authors to terminate their assignments and recapture their copyrights. For works after January 1, 1978 (the year the 1976 Act went into effect) grants, assignments and licenses can be terminated during a five year window starting 35 years after such grant was made.  For the termination to be effective a letter requesting that the copyrights revert must be sent no more than 10 years prior and no less than two years prior to the effective termination date.  There are certain other formalities such as recording a termination notice with the Copyright Office. 

Here’s how Section 203 works: suppose a song was written and assigned on January 2, 1978; the writer could get his/her copyright back between the years 2013 – 2018 (1978 + 35 years + 5 year window).  Termination letters could be sent beginning in 1993 and no later than 2016 (10 years prior to 2013 and less than two years before 2018). If done correctly and timely, publishers cannot deny these termination letters. As an added bonus you cannot waive your rights in advance.  Thus, the contract you had me sign granting you my copyrights for life of copyright would not affect my right to recapture my copyrights.  In fact, right now, there are writers and artists in this exact position requesting their copyrights revert back to them.   However, if you do not send a proper termination letter during the proper time frame, the contract will then go back into effect and the publisher or record label would continue to own your copyrights for life of the copyright. 

So what’s the big deal about getting your copyrights back?  What do you do if you get your copyrights back?  Suppose you don’t have any business experience and have no idea what to do to market and get your material out to the public?  Fear not readers.  You can use this as a negotiating tool.  For example: suppose your contract allowed for a future advance of x dollars and a money split of x%.  Well, you could renegotiate all your terms.  You could ask for three times x and a money split of x+10%.  I will let you fill in the x’s, percentages and numbers until you are happy because that is how you could (and should) handle negotiations of this type.  You should see what would make you happy to stay with the same company.  Another option would be to take your copyrights and move to another company on more favorable terms.  Yet another option would be to recapture your copyrights and start a company to start selling or licensing your copyrights.   There are countless options available if you decide to recapture your copyrights. 

It is important to remember the value of a label or a publisher is the value of the copyrights it owns and controls.  Think of how many albums the Beatles, Stevie Wonder, The Who, Led Zeppelin, Ray Charles, etc. still sell (click here to read about the revenue still generated by Ray Charles).  Think of how many times you hear those same artists on the radio or in movies or on television or in video games.  (Labels currently do not receive money for terrestrial radio play.  Please see the post on the Performance Rights Act). Now, you may not be as well known as the artists just mentioned but think of how much you could do if you had the rights to.  A label usually only pushes an album for about 12-18 months; after that the album slowly fades into obscurity.  However, they still own the copyrights.  If the label does not push it; no one can.  Now, if you had your rights back you could go out and try to get your music placed on television shows, movies, video games and commercials and reap 100% of the money.  There are several companies out there that pitch and place music in all these areas (for a fee or commission).  Another source of income could be repackaging and selling your album yourself.  Whether it is on iTunes or at the local indie shop; you could sell your own cds and keep your own money.  No one will ever care about your music more than you.  If you are back in control of your songs and master recordings, your music may get a new push and find opportunities you never thought possible.  

This is an exciting time in the music industry.  Every year new writers and artists start entering the termination period for copyrights.  New business models, new marketing techniques and new interest in older songs are going to emerge.  I, personally, cannot wait to hear a great song that some label or publisher forgot about back in 1978. 

This is an extremely interesting and complicated issue.  We at L4M will have many more articles about this issue and how it relates to you.  Future posts will discuss pre-1978 works, sound recordings, works made for hire, heirs’ rights and the importance of record keeping.  Stay tuned…





Section 181…ALMOST THERE! (Maybe)

29 05 2010

POST UPDATE

Bad news. Section 181 seemsto be cursed.  A better explanation is that the extension is linked to a huge political battle over extending unemployment insurance.  Washington at its best.  Read more here.   http://www.opencongress.org/articles/view/1921-Dems-Lose-Big-on-Unemployment-Insurance-Tax-Extenders-Vote.

Originally Published on May 29, 2010

The House voted to pass HR 4213 with some minor revisions and amendments.  After passing the House and the Senate earlier this year, Congress could not present the bill to the President until proposed changes (which likely means more pork was added) were debated.   Thankfully for film makers, an extension of Section 181 through December 31, 2010 remained as part of the bill without any modification.  The extension will permit films that were or are being produced in 2010 to utilize the tax deduction.

Even though it still looks like we are on the right track (which we have been for about 6 months), Congress adjourned for a week long holiday.  So the Senate and President will not see this Bill until at least June 7.    

Obviously, this extension will be great news for everyone associated with making movies in the United States.  To find out more about Section 181 or to figure out how it can help with your film’s money raise, please feel free to contact us at josh@lawyer4musicians or info@tkhlaw.comRemember, HR 4213 is not a law yet (not until the President signs it) and this blog does not contain legal advice upon which you may rely.  Thanks to all readers who help us stay on top of this and correct any misinformation that is out there. 





CELABELS: Anyone Can Have a Music Label.

28 05 2010

Music Mogul?

What are the requirements of owning and operating your own music label?  Apparently having a recognizable name and a healthy checkbook and/or ego are prerequisites.  Recently, Perez Hilton announced the launch of his label Perezcious Music, then David Letterman through his hat into the ring with Clear Entertainment and just this week, the most qualified American Idol judge, Ellen DeGeneres, joined the fracas by forming ElevenEleven Music.

So these media moguls who have worked very hard for a long time to reach their respective level of celebrity recognized the same thing that we have been writing about for the past few years: Major Labels are dying.  There is a wide gap in the industry where well funded and well publicized projects can have a real impact and make real money.

The independent model (self funded, self produced, self released) has fizzled a bit over the best year or so.  The glut of content and ease of production has made it harder to get noticed.  But the labels remain in disarray and the old multi-album record agreements are not coming back.  So is the only way to get your music out and actually noticed partnering with a celebrity?!?  We’re here to say…not necessarily.

What do these new Celables (I want credit for this new moniker) s have that attracts musicians?  1.  Money (in Letterman’s case, a whole lot of it); 2. Celebrity/Fame/Recognizability and 3. Easy Access to the Public.

Each one of the above three examples has enough money (or access to money) to fund a “major label” like push for an artist.  (Notice that they are starting modestly with one or two artists evidently learning from the failed major label model of signing every artist and hoping one hits)  That means that they can afford to pay for the production and recording of an album, pay for the marketing and advertising prior to and during the release of the album (including paying to get music in the right places, on the radio, on MTV, etc.), pay for a distribution agreement and pay tour support to get the artist out on the road in front of his newly purchased fan base.  The obvious HUGE plus with being part of a Celeb label is the instant recognizability that it gives to the artist.  Any piece of press that talks about Ellen’s new label will inevitably mention her new artist as well.  Finally, what better way to push the artist in front of an enormous audience than to promote him or her on your own show or website.  The Celables will push (as all of them already have on their own shows, websites, and other appearances) their artists to their previously established enormous fan base.  Think how hard it is to get to perform on Letterman.  Now think how easy it is to perform on Letterman, in front of millions of potential purchasers of music, if you are on Mr. Letterman’s label.

So how can an indie compete with a Celable?  Well, there really is no replacement for the first requirement: Money.  However, as we have consistently written here on L4M, if you push your music to the level where an investor may be intrigued enough to partner with you, you may be able to get a regular old rich guy to take care of this need.  Now, your rich guy is probably not David Letterman, but with the rich guy’s best asset, money, you can purchase a lot of what the Celables have.  Buying the right marketing, or better yet, partnering with the right marketing and public relations firm can get you the placements you need, the buzz you deserve and even land you on the Ellen show.  Paying for an experienced management team can also get you that access as well as get you bookings at big shows or on legit tours.

The point, the model of a musician investor partnership can work.  Does it work better if that investor is uber famous?  Probably.  But, putting the right team together and using money in a smart and creative way can get you to the same point as Runner Runner (never heard of them?  they are Letterman’s band).

SELF-PROMOTION OF THE MONTH:  NEW ARTISTS

As the L4M family grows, so does our client base.  Check out this talented dude:

THE SHOW is about to start.  Nasser THE SHOW Goins is what’s next in hip hop.  You just might know it yet.  Letting everyone know that Uncool is the New Cool this Hip Hop Rock Star has all the tricks.  Check it:





L4M and Friends Make a Move

21 05 2010


Exciting news from L4M headquarters.  After following the recent trends in film and music, the L4M team (basically yours truly) decided that independent is, in fact, better.  While we have always brought an unfettered view of the industry and have not exactly been held back by the “establishment”, we have officially started practicing what we have preached.

Along with a couple of other former partners and one new music guru, a new firm was formed.  Troglia Kaplan Holzman will be the law firm behind the L4M crew for the foreseeable future.  We are a general business law firm that specializes in helping creative individuals and their businesses navigate through the turbulent legal and business world that surrounds them.  Our new firm will give us even more flexibility and availability to help musicians, film makers and artists to treat their particular craft as an actual business.  Basically this move will allow our Left Brain Guide to the Right Brain Thinker grow and improve.

Contact us if you have questions or issues that you would like to see tackled by us and this site: josh@lawyer4musicians.com or info@tkhlaw.com.

To find out more about our newest L4Mer, click here and discover the man, the myth, the legend: Ajay Gosain.